Take Mission Impossible 3, written by Alex Kurtzman, Robert Ochi and JJ Abrams (though this particular shuffle, which took place during filming, was done by Abrams). It is in my opinion the best of the Mission Impossible movies, but that is irrelevant.

But Abrams decided to start the film with a flashforward to much later in the film, where Ethan has an explosive device in his head and his nemesis has his wife at gunpoint, gagged in a chair opposite him.
What follows is the tensest scene in the movie as Ethan tries everything in his disposal to stop his wife being killed. Then we cut to black on a gunshot.
This instantly gets the audience interested, we're with Ethan through the story now, we know what it comes to and we care about the characters and what happens to them, we want to know how it happens. It also serves to completely change the focus of the engagement party (which follows it) we now not only see it as what he has to lose, but what he has to gain all at once.
Despite this, at first glance it may appear that Abrams has blown his load a little early, showing us that will mean we don't care as we have seen the tensest, most emotional scene of the film early. But we haven't seen the pay off. And because of this the inevitable demise of his nemesis is all the more impactful on the audience who have been waiting the entire movie to see it happen.
This simple decision changes the focus of the whole film and show the ripple effect that restructuring can have, adding high tension and emotion to scenes which may have seemed the audiences attentions wane without it.
However making sure that your screenplay has maximum impact is up to you. So look through your screenplay, think of the set piece moments and think what has built up to them. Is there anything that can be changed to make them more affecting to the audience? If so, try it out.
No comments:
Post a Comment